-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
upgrade api version #13976
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upgrade api version #13976
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the LinkedIn components, primarily focusing on version number increments across various modules and modifications to the API request construction logic. The changes include transitioning from object-based parameters to query string construction for API calls, enhancing pagination handling, and updating method signatures for clarity. These adjustments align the components with a new API release, ensuring compatibility and improved functionality. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-access-control/get-organization-access-control.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-administrators/get-organization-administrators.mjs (2 hunks)
- components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-access-control/get-organization-access-control.mjs
- components/linkedin/actions/get-organization-administrators/get-organization-administrators.mjs
Additional comments not posted (2)
components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs (2)
49-49: Consistency in mapping option valuesMapping
valuetoelement.idensures consistency with the expected option structure wherevaluerepresents the internal identifier.
142-146: Verify the necessity of both_makeRequestand_makeRequestAxiosmethodsThe
_makeRequestmethod overlaps in functionality with the new_makeRequestAxiosmethod. Maintaining both methods may introduce redundancy and potential confusion. Verify if both are required, or if one can be refactored or removed to streamline the codebase.Run the following script to identify usages of
_makeRequestin the codebase:Verification successful
Both
_makeRequestand_makeRequestAxiosmethods serve distinct purposesAfter careful analysis, it appears that both
_makeRequestand_makeRequestAxiosmethods are necessary in the LinkedIn app:
_makeRequestis the primary method for making API requests, used extensively across various endpoints._makeRequestAxiosseems to be a newer or specialized method, currently used for thegetAccessControlfunctionality.The methods have slight differences in implementation, suggesting they serve different use cases. Maintaining both allows for gradual migration or handling of specific scenarios.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all references to `_makeRequest` method in the codebase. # Search for `_makeRequest` usages in JavaScript/TypeScript files. rg --type js --type ts '_makeRequest\('Length of output: 11113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods in the LinkedIn app file echo "Searching for _makeRequest:" rg '_makeRequest\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs echo -e "\nSearching for _makeRequestAxios:" rg '_makeRequestAxios\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjsLength of output: 856
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve implementations and usage context of _makeRequest and _makeRequestAxios methods echo "Implementation of _makeRequest:" rg -A 10 'async _makeRequest\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs echo -e "\nImplementation of _makeRequestAxios:" rg -A 10 'async _makeRequestAxios\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs echo -e "\nUsage context of _makeRequest:" rg -B 2 -A 2 'this._makeRequest\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjs echo -e "\nUsage context of _makeRequestAxios:" rg -B 2 -A 2 'this._makeRequestAxios\(' components/linkedin/linkedin.app.mjsLength of output: 3567
Resolves #13965
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes